Tuesday, November 12, 2013

One Solid Nation or a Community of Communities?


Prime Minister Joe Clark:
   “In an immense country, you live on a local scale. Governments make the nations work by recognizing that we are fundamentally a community of communities. Whatever cultures we come from, whatever heritage we bring to these shores, we are all of us North American in aspiration. We want to build. We want to grow. Generally, the goals of Canadians are personal goals. A few people in our history have helped build our nation by consciously pursuing national goals, but many more have built this nation by pursuing the personal  goals which the nature of this nation allows. The personal goal of most Canadians has been freedom and some security for their family. That caused the settlement of new regions, caused the immigration of new citizens, caused the transplanting of old roots to new ground. A policy designed to make the nation grow must build upon and must not frustrate the instinct of most Canadians to build a stake for themselves.”

What is “Federalism”?
  A system in which government powers are shared by a national government and provincial (or state) administrations.
Examples:
  The United States
  Mexico
  The former Soviet Union
  Germany

The roles of the different levels of government are defined in constitutions but usually remain in flux. Sometimes the system collapses entirely, as in the American Civil War.
Canada had just three regions when the three provinces of British North America were joined in a Confederation in 1867:
  The Maritimes
  The St. Lawrence Valley
  Southern Ontario
Canada also had “territories”:  The Pacific Coast, which was a separate set of colonies, but what are now Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta were “territories” under federal government control in 1867, as was the arctic.
Prince Edward Island was also a colony with some self-government until 1871. Newfoundland remained a separate country until 1949.
Is Canada – or the US or Germany – a collection of independent countries (states/nations) or one country that allows lower level of governments to exist and exercise power? Is Canada – or the US or Germany – a collection of independent countries (states/nations) or one country that allows lower level of governments to exist and exercise power? That was the question that started the U.S. Civil War and has been argued for generations in Canada, especially regarding Quebec.
Because, if a federation is actually a group of countries joined together, they can be “unjoined”
The trend in the last century is toward federation breakdown:
  Austria-Hungary (1918)
  The Turkish empire (1918)
  The Russian Empire/Soviet Union (1918-1921; 1990s)
  Yugoslavia (1990s)
  The United Kingdom of Great Britain (“Devolution” underway in Scotland, Wales and Ireland.

And as-yet unfilled national aspirations:
  Kurds
  Basques
  Catalonians in Spain
  Mexican Native groups
  Canadian and US First Nations

.
National Government Powers
  Immigration
  Transportation
  Telecommunications
  Some resources
  Native Affairs
  Foreign Affairs
  Defence
  Criminal justice
  Agriculture
  Industry
  Banking and macroeconomic issues
  Some labour law
  Regulation of key sectors
  Fisheries
  Environment (some)
  Energy
  Health (standards)
  Unemployment Insurance
  Old Age Pensions
  RCMP
  Prisons
  Parks
  Federally-chartered corporations

Provincial Powers
  Health care
  Education
  Highways
  Municipalities (creatures of the provinces)
  Electricity
  Resources
  Environment
  Administration of most of the courts
  Civil law
  Rules regarding securities (stocks and bonds)
  Corporation rules
Look at how many of those powers and services overlap… (and we’ll ignore the overlap with cities…)

Canadian de-Confederation Movements
  Nova Scotia before World War I
  Newfoundland
  Quebec
  Alberta (and sometimes Saskatchewan)
  First Nations 

Nova Scotia:
  Nova Scotia felt strong-armed into Confederation
  Almost all of the members of the first Nova Scotia legislature and the MPs elected by Nova Scotians in 1867 wanted out of Confederation.
  Many gripes the same as Nova Scotia’s

Newfoundland:
  Idea that Britain forced the colony into Confederation in 1949
  Many Newfoundlanders believe Ottawa has cheated the province re: resources
  In the early 2000s, the Newfoundland government took down all the flags on provincial buildings
Quebec
  Strong nationalist movement with Survivance as the underlying idea.
  World War I and World War II conscription (forced military service)
  The Quiet Revolution
  The 1976 Parti Quebecois victory
  The 1980 Referendum
  The Meech Lake-Charlottetown Accord
  The 1995 Referendum
  “Quebec is a Nation”
  “Values “ Charter

Alberta
  The National Energy Program
  The Western Canada Concept
  The Rise of the Reform Party

First Nations
  Are they part of the Confederation pact?
  Have they ever given up sovereignty
  Self-government: more than just “reserves”?
  Plus, “regions” do not fit provincial boundaries
  And within the giant provinces, there are communities within communities: ethnic groups, linguistic minorities, First Nations, and even sub-regions (Northern Ontario-Southern Ontario)

Challenges for the Future
  Immigration: Are Canada’s old fights relevant to new Canadians?
  Is power actually shifting?
  Does regionalism hide more fundamental problems?

  Could the national government become irrelevant? 

No comments:

Post a Comment